Beskydy 2017, 10, 99-112
https://doi.org/10.11118/beskyd201710010099
Economic value of ecosystem services in Protected Landscape Areas in the Czech Republic
References
1. AOPK 2015: Protected Landscape Areas of the Czech Republic. Nature Conservation Agency of the Czech Republic, Prague. http://www.ochranaprirody.cz/res/archive/300/036901.pdf?seek=1465902968
2. , D. J., Von Wehrden, H., Baumgärtner, S., Fischer, J., Hanspach, J., Härdtle, W., Heinrichs, H. 2014: Ecosystem services as a boundary object for sustainability. Ecological Economics, 103: 29–37.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.04.012>
3. , I.J., Mace, G.M., Fezzi, C., Atkinson, G., Turner, K. 2011: Economic analysis for ecosystem service assessments. Environmental and Resource Economics, 48: 177–218.
<https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-010-9418-x>
4. , E.M., Cramer, W., Begossi, A., Cundill, G., Díaz, S., Woodward, B.N. 2015: Linking biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human well-being: Three challenges for designing research for sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 14: 76–85.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.03.007>
5. , R., De Groot, R., Braat, L., Kubiszewski, I., Fioramonti, L., Sutton, P., Farber, S., Grasso, M. 2017: Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to go? Ecosystem Services, 28: 1–16.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.008>
6. , R., De Groot, R., Sutton, P., Van Der Ploeg, S., Anderson, S.J., Kubiszewski, I., Farber, S., Turner, R.K. 2014: Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change, 26(1): 152–158.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002>
7. , G. C., Polasky, S., Goldstein, J., Kareiva, P. M., Mooney, H. A., Pejchar, L., Ricketts, T. H., Salzman, J., Shallenberger, R. 2009: Ecosystem services in decision making: Time to deliver. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7(1): 21–28.
<https://doi.org/10.1890/080025>
8. , A. P., Casalegno, S., Marquet, P. A., Gaston, K. J. 2013: Representation of Ecosystem Services by Terrestrial Protected Areas: Chile as a Case Study. PLoS ONE, 8(12): e82643.
<https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082643>
9. , F., Armsworth, P.R., Anderson, B.J., Heinemeyer, A., Gillings, S., Roy, D.B., Thomas, C.D., Gaston, K.J. 2010: Error propagation associated with benefits transfer- based mapping of ecosystem services. Biological Conservation, 143: 2487–2493.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.06.015>
10. , J., Vačkář, D., Pártl, A., Loučková, B., Harmáčková, Z.V., Lorencová, E. 2014: Integrated Assessment of Ecosystem Services in the Czech Republic. Ecosystem Services, 8: 110–117.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.03.001>
11. Getzner, M. 2009: Economic and Cultural Values Related to Protected Areas – Valuation of Ecosystem Services in Tatra (PL) and Slovensky Raj (SK) National Parks. Department of Economics (Klagenfurt University) Research Report to WWF (World Wildlife Fund) International, Vienna.
12. Haines-Young, R., Potschin, M. 2013: Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES): Consultation on Version 4, August-December 2012. Report to the European Environment Agency. https://cices.eu/content/uploads/sites/8/2012/07/CICES-V43_Revised-Final_Report_29012013.pdf
13. , J., Kehl, C., Loft, L. 2016: The economic approach to ecosystem services and biodiversity: Policy design and institutions matter. GAIA, 25(3): 174–181.
<https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.25.3.8>
14. , L. 2011: Economic Benefits Generated by Protected Areas: the Case of the Hoge Veluwe Forest, the Netherlands. Ecology and Society, 16(2):13.
<https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04119-160213>
15. Hönigová, I., Vačkář, D., Lorencová, E., Melichar, J., Götzl, M., Sonderegger, G., Oušková, V., Hošek, M., Chobot, K. 2012: Survey on grassland ecosystem services. Report to the EEA – European Topic Centre on Biological Diversity. Prague: Nature Conservation Agency of the Czech Republic, p. 78.
16. , M. W., Foster, S. G. 2008: The value of ecosystem services provided by the U.S. National Wildlife Refuge System in the contiguous U.S. Ecological Economics, 67: 608–618.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.01.012>
17. , A., Anderson, S., Dyer, M.J.B., Sutton, P.C. 2017: Revisiting ecosystem services: Assessment and valuation as starting points for environmental politics. Sustainability, 9(10): 1755.
<https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101755>
18. , L., Čivić, K. 2013: European protected areas: Past, present and future. Journal for Nature Conservation, 21(2): 122–124.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2012.11.006>
19. , Ch.A., De Sartre, X. A., Castro-Larraňaga, M. 2015: The political ecology of ecosystem services. Geoforum, 61: 122–134.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.03.004>
20. , S., Costanza, R., Troy, A., D’agostino, J.D., Mates, W. 2010: Valuing New Jersey’s ecosystem services and natural capital: a spatially explicit benefit transfer approach. Environmental Management, 45: 1271–1285.
<https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-010-9483-5>
21. , J. 2015: Ecosystem disservices: Embrace the catchword. Ecosystem Services, 12: 136.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.11.008>
22. MA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment) 2005: Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: A Framework for Assessment. Report of the Conceptual Framework Working Group of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Island Press, Washington, DC.
23. MAES (Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services) 2016: Mapping and assessing the condition of Europe’s ecosystems: Progress and challenges. 3rd Report – Final, March 2016. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/knowledge/ecosystem_assessment/pdf/3rdMAESReport_Condition.pdf
24. , D.J. 2006: Selling out on nature. Nature, 443: 27–28.
<https://doi.org/10.1038/443027a>
25. , M.L. 2009: Assessing benefit transfer for the valuation of ecosystem services. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7(1): 38–45.
<https://doi.org/10.1890/080091>
26. , A.S., Bangpan, M., Dalrymple, S., Dickson, K., Haddaway, N.R., Healey, J.R., Hauari, H., Hockley, N., Jones, J.P.G., Knight, T., Vigurs, C., Oliver, S. 2013: Human well-being impacts of terrestrial protected areas. Environmental Evidence, 2: 19.
<https://doi.org/10.1186/2047-2382-2-19>
27. , J., Primmer, E. 2016: A Case Study of Ecosystem Services in Urban Planning in Finland: Benefits, Rights and Responsibilities. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning,18(3): 286–305.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2015.1076721>
28. , M., Van Der Zanden, E.H., Van Oudenhoven, A.P.E., Remme, R.P., Serna-Chavez, H.M., De Groot, R.S., Opdam, P. 2014: Ecosystem Services as a Contested Concept: A Synthesis of Critique and Counter-Arguments. Conservation Letters, 7(6): 514–523.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12091>
29. , M., Albert, Ch., Marques, A., Tobon, W., Lavorel, S., Maes, J., Brown, C., Klotz, S., Bonn, A. 2016: National Ecosystem Assessments in Europe: A Review, BioScience, 66(10): 813–828.
<https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biw101>
30. , W., Persson, Å., Deutsch, L., Zelasiewicz, J., Williams, M., Richardson, K., Crumley, C., Crutzen, P., Folke, C., Gordon, L., Molina, M., Ramanathan, V., Rockström, J., Scheffer, M., Schellnhuber, H.J., Svedin, U. 2011: The anthropocene: From global change to planetary stewardship. Ambio, 40(7): 739–761.
<https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-011-0185-x>
31. Teeb (The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity) 2013: Guidance Manual for TEEB Country Studies. Version 1. 0. http://www.teebweb.org/media/2013/10/TEEB_GuidanceManual_2013_1. 0. pdf
32. , A., Wilson, M.A. 2006: Mapping ecosystem services: Practical challenges and opportunities in linking GIS and value transfer. Ecological Economics, 60: 435–449.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.04.007>
33. , M.A., Hoehn, J.P. 2006: Valuing environmental goods and services using benefit transfer: the state-of-the art and science. Ecological Economics, 60: 335–342.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.08.015>
34. , C. E. L., Shi, K., Riordan, P. 2015: Ecosystem Service Valuation Assessments for Protected Area Management: A Case Study Comparing Methods Using Different Land Cover Classification and Valuation Approaches. PLoS ONE, 10(6): e0129748.
<https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129748>
