Beskydy 2012, 5, 99-110
https://doi.org/10.11118/beskyd201205020099
What is the potential of site units applied into forestry management in Slovakia to describe production of beech stands?
References
1. , S. R., Shelburne, V. B., MacDonald, N. W. 2003: Multifactor classification of forest landscape ecosystems of Jocassee Gorges, southern Appalanchian Mountains, South Carolina. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 33: 1933–1946.
<https://doi.org/10.1139/x03-116>
2. Allen, B. H. 1987: Ecological Type Classification for California: The Forest Service Approach. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-98. Berkely CA: Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture: 8 pp.
3. , A. K. 1949: Forest types and their significance. Acta Forestalia Fennica, 56 (5): 1–71.
4. , D., Roberts, D. A. 1996: Development of ecological land classification and mapping in support of forest management. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 39: 199–213.
<https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00396145>
5. Barnes, B. V., Zak, D. R., Denton, Sh. R., Spurr, S. H. 1998: Forest ecology. 4th Edition. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., USA: 774 pp.
6. , F. 1993: Climatic signals in tree-rings of Fagus sylvatica L. from the central Apennines, Italy. Acta Oecologica, 14: 57–71.
7. Biondi, F., Visani, S. 1996: Recent developments in the analysis of an Italian tree-ring network with emphasis on European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). In: Dean, J.S., Meko, D.M., Swetnam, T.W. (Eds.), Tree Rings, Environment and Humanity, Special Volume. Radiocarbon, 713–725.
8. , A. B. 2006: Synergistic Techniques for Better Understanding and Classifying the Environmental Structure of Landscapes. Environmental Management, 37 (1): 126–140.
<https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-004-0058-1>
9. Buček, A., Lacina, J. 1999: Geobiocenologie II. [skripta]. Brno, MZLU, LDF: 240 s.
10. , C., Zech,W., Elling,W. 2003: Growth variations of common beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) under different climatic and environmental conditions in Europe - a dendroecological study. Forest Ecology and Management, 173: 63–78.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00816-7>
11. , H. 1974: Zeigerwerte der Gefässpfanzen Mitteleuropas. Scripta Geobotanica, 9: 1–97.
12. , M. 2003: Rastový simulátor SIBYLA a možnosti jeho uplatnenia pri obhospodarovaní lesa. [Growth simulator SIBYLA and its possibilities of application to forest management] Lesnícky časopis - Forestry Journal, 49 (2): 135–151.
13. , D., Hicks, R. R., Colbert, J. J. 2002: Influence of topographic aspect, precipitation and drought on radial growth of four major tree species in an Appalachian watershed. Forest Ecology and Management, 177 (1-3): 409–425.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00446-2>
14. Halaj, J., Bortel, J., Grék, J., Mecko, J., Midriak, R., Petráš, R., Sobocký, E., Tutka, J., Valtýni, J. 1990: Rubná zrelosť drevín. [Rotation period of tree species] Príroda Bratislava, 115 s.
15. Halaj, J., Pánek, F., Petráš, R. 1980: Rozbor rastových procesov rovnovekých nezmiešaných porastov. [Analysis of growth processes of even-aged homogeneous forest stands] Záverečná správa. Zvolen, VÚLH, 87 s.
16. Halaj, J., Pánek, F., Petráš, R., Grék, J. 1980: Výskum a konštrukcia rastových tabuliek hlavných drevín ČSSR. [Research and construction of growth tables of main tree species of CSSR] Záverečná správa. Zvolen, VÚLH, 242 s.
17. Halaj, J., Petráš, R. 1998: Rastové tabuľky hlavných drevín. [Growth tables of main tree species] SAP Press, Bratislava, 325 s.
18. Hančinský, L. 1972: Lesné typy Slovenska. [Forest site types of Slovakia] Príroda, Bratislava, 307 s.
19. Hemilton, R. A. 1995: Forest Soils and Site Index. Woodland Owner Notes, North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service, North Carolina State University: 6–7.
20. , Y., Ying, M., Huiyan, G., Peng, L. 1999: Site classification of the eastern forest region of Daxing’an Mountains. Journal of Forestry Research, 10 (2): 129–131.
<https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02855545>
21. , S. 2007: Vliv různého zastoupení buku na jeho kvalitu a produkce ve směsi s modřínem [Effects of the various proportion of beech on its quality and production in a mixture with larch]. Zprávy lesnického výzkumu, 52 (1): 5–9.
22. Križová, E. 1995: Fytocenológia a lesnícka typológia. [Phytocoenology and forest typology] Technická univerzita vo Zvolene, Zvolen, 180 s.
23. Križová, E., Nič, J. 1991: Fytocenológia a lesnícka typológia. [Phytocoenology and forest typology] Návody na cvičenia. TU Zvolen, 112 s.
24. , J. 1993a: The direct determination of the geobiocen edaphic-trophic orders and interorders. Ecologia Bratislava, 12 (4): 373–385.
25. , J. 1993b: Theoretical possibilities of the direct geobiocens homeostatic trophotope determination. Ecology, 12 (4): 361–371.
26. Larsen, D. R., Hann, D. W. 1987: Height-diameter eqations for seventeen tree species in Southwest Oregon. Forest Research Laboratory, Oregon State University, Corvallis. Research Paper 49, 16 pp.
27. , J., Leuschner, Ch. 2008: Growth of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) saplings is limited by elevated atmospheric vapour pressure deficits. Forest Ecology and Management, 256 (4): 648–655.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.05.008>
28. Merganič, J., Vorčák, J., Merganičová, K., Ďurský, J., Miková, A., Škvarenina, J., Tuček, J., Minďáš, J. 2003: Monitoring diverzity horských lesov severnej Oravy. [Monitoring of diversity of mountains forests in Northern Orava] EFRA. Tvrdošín: 200 s.
29. Pagan, J. 1999: Lesnícka dendrológia. [Forest dendrology] Vysokoškolské skriptá. TU Zvolen: 378 s.
30. , G., Schirone, B. 2000: Winter North Atlantic Oscillation effects on the tree rings of the Italian beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). International Journal of Biometeorology, 44: 121–127.
<https://doi.org/10.1007/s004840000055>
31. , G., Bernabei, M., Di Filippo, A., Romagnoli, M., Schirone, B. 2003: A long-term tree ring beech chronology from a high elevation old-growth forest of Central Italy. Dendrochronologia, 21: 1–10.
<https://doi.org/10.1078/1125-7865-00036>
32. , G., Biondi, F., Bernabei, M., Filippo, A., Schirone, B. 2005: Spatial and altitudinal bioclimatic zones of the Italian peninsula identified from a beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) tree-ring network. Acta Oecologica, 27 (3): 197–210.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2005.01.001>
33. Randuška, D., Vorel, J., Plíva, K. 1986: Fytocenológia a lesnícka typológia. [Phytocoenology and forest typology]. Príroda, Bratislava, 344 s.
34. Ray, D. 2001: Ecological Site Classification. A PC-based Decision Support System for British Forests. User’s guide, Version 1.7. Crown, UK, 44 pp.
35. , J. S. 1996: Land classification and ecosystem classification. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 39: 11–20.
<https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00396131>
36. StatSoft, Inc. 2005: STATISTICA CZ [Software for data analysis], verze 7.1. www.StatSoft.cz.
37. Schwarz, M. Lesoprojekt [Internet]. SK: National Forest Centre; 2009 March 23; Available from: http://www.lesoprojekt.sk/english/default.htm.
38. Šebík, L., Polák, L. 1990: Náuka o produkcii dreva. [Wood production] Príroda Bratislava, 322 s.
39. Šmelko, Š., Wenk, G., Antanaitis, V. 1992: Rast, štruktúra a produkcia lesa. [Growth, structure, and production of forest] Príroda Bratislava, 319 s.
40. Šmelko, Š., Merganič, J., Šebeň, V., Raši, R., Jankovič, J. 2006: Národná Inventarizácia a monitoring lesov Slovenskej republiky 2005–2006. [National Forest Inventory and Monitoring in Slovak Republic 2005 – 2006] Metodika terénneho zberu údajov. [Methodology of field data collection] 3. doplnená verzia. NLC Zvolen, 129 s.
41. Vyskot, M., Doležal, B., Jurča, J., Korf, V., Korpeľ, Š., Macháč, D., Polák, L., Priesol, A., Řehák, J., Wolf, J. 1971: Základy růstu a produkce lesů. [Fundamentals of forest growth and production] SZN Praha, 440 s.
42. Zlatník, A. 1959: Přehled slovenských lesů podle skupin lesních typů. [Overview of Slovak forests according to forest site type groups] LF VŠZ Brno, 195 s.
43. Zlatník, A. 1976: Lesnická fytologie. [Forest phytology] SZN Praha, 495 s.
