Beskydy 2015, 8, 55-58

https://doi.org/10.11118/beskyd201508010055

Potential of Douglas­‑fir as a partial substitute for Norway spruce – review of the newest Czech literature

Vilém Podrázský

Department of Silviculture, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 1176, 165 21 Praha 6 – Suchdol, Czech Republic

Crossref Cited-by Linking

  • Miller Tobias Walter, Stangler Dominik Florian, Larysch Elena, Honer Harald, Seifert Thomas, Puhlmann Heike, von Arx Georg, Fonti Patrick, Fonti Marina V., Rathgeber Cyrille B.K., Kahle Hans-Peter: Longer and faster: Intra-annual growth dynamics of Douglas fir outperform Norway spruce and silver fir over wide climatic gradients. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 2022, 321, 108970. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2022.108970>
  • Mihai Georgeta, Curtu Alexandru-Lucian, Alexandru Alin-Madalin, Nita Ion-Andrei, Ciocîrlan Elena, Birsan Marius-Victor: Growth and Adaptive Capacity of Douglas Fir Genetic Resources from Western Romania under Climate Change. Forests 2022, 13, 805. <https://doi.org/10.3390/f13050805>
  • Vitali Valentina, Forrester David I., Bauhus Jürgen: Know Your Neighbours: Drought Response of Norway Spruce, Silver Fir and Douglas Fir in Mixed Forests Depends on Species Identity and Diversity of Tree Neighbourhoods. Ecosystems 2018, 21, 1215. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-017-0214-0>
  • Vitali Valentina, Büntgen Ulf, Bauhus Jürgen: Silver fir and Douglas fir are more tolerant to extreme droughts than Norway spruce in south‐western Germany. Global Change Biology 2017, 23, 5108. <https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13774>
  • Подразски, Podrazski Vilem, Матвеев, Matveev Sergey: Douglas-fir – spruce for the 22nd century? Review of the recent Czech literature. Forestry Engineering Journal 2015, 5, 51. <https://doi.org/10.12737/17402>
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo